Tbo Touch has stirred significant conversation across social media platforms with his recent remarks on financial responsibilities within relationships.
Image: Tbo Touch Instagram
South African media mogul Thabo Molefe, popularly known as Tbo Touch, has stirred significant conversation across social media platforms with his recent remarks on financial responsibilities within relationships.
Appearing on the “L-Tido Podcast” hosted by L-Tido, the charismatic radio DJ shared his belief that women should not contribute to household expenses, igniting a spirited discourse on traditional gender roles and financial dynamics among the youth.
Touch, who is no stranger to sharing bold opinions, laid down his stance emphatically: “No man should be bringing anybody into their space if they’re not prepared to take care of you… you are violating one of the biggest commandments under the sun by sitting with your wife and you have to scrutinise your budget… and say I’m paying 50% and you are paying 50%.”
His comments suggest a conviction that the patriarchal model of providing for a family should remain intact, regardless of the changing socio-economic landscape.
During the interview, Touch also delved into personal anecdotes, reflecting on his journey through therapy, financial tribulations, and ongoing lawsuits. However, it was his views on financial responsibility that captured the most attention, leading to a viral debate online.
Given the ongoing economic struggles faced by many South Africans, his remarks have prompted users to share their perspectives, both in support and opposition.
One user on X questioned, “Then why should women be employed if they won’t contribute anything?”
Another added, “I have a different but perhaps similar view. A woman should not work when she doesn't want to, but if she does, she must assist with groceries and kids' clothing. The rest is preferably mine provided financial muscles allow.”
Others chimed in with thoughts across the spectrum, from a call for equal contribution in the modern partnership to critiques of Touch's traditional perspective.
The debate surrounding Touch's comments reflects wider societal changes, particularly around the roles of men and women in domestic and economic spheres. Advocates for gender equality champion the idea of shared responsibilities in modern relationships, arguing that a partnership should transcend traditional boundaries.
In contrast, traditionalists like Touch maintain that a man's responsibility should centre on providing for his family, a value rooted deeply in their upbringing and societal constructs.
As SA grapples with evolving gender dynamics, the conversation ignited by Touch illustrates not only a clash of ideals but also the ongoing reexamination of roles within relationships.
The varied responses reveal a generational divide, as younger individuals challenge conventions and advocate for equitable partnerships that are founded on shared responsibilities.