McLaren starts off 2026 season with court victory

A pre-season confidence boost for the Woking squad

Jehran Naidoo|Published

Lando Norris claimed a nail-biting 2025 F1 Drivers’ Championship while Verstappen earned the highest salary – and Ferrari’s investment in its drivers did not pay off.

Image: AFP

McLaren may not have turned a wheel yet, but the Woking squad has already chalked up a significant win ahead of the 2026 season, and this one came in a courtroom rather than on the racetrack.

The British team has emerged victorious from a long running legal dispute with IndyCar star Alex Palou, after a UK High Court ruled that the Spaniard breached his contract with McLaren.

The judgment sees McLaren awarded more than 12 million dollars (just over R193 million) in damages, a ruling that sends a clear and forceful message across the motorsport paddock.

The case dates back to 2022, when Palou signed an agreement to join McLaren’s IndyCar operation for the 2024 season.

The deal was not just limited to America. It also included ties to McLaren’s Formula One program, where Palou was named a reserve driver and completed a free practice outing at the United States Grand Prix. However, the agreement quickly unravelled.

Palou ultimately chose to remain with Chip Ganassi Racing, the team with which he has enjoyed huge success, including multiple IndyCar titles. While Palou admitted to breaching the contract, his defence centred on the claim that McLaren had suffered little to no financial harm as a result. The court did not agree.

In its ruling, the judge found that McLaren endured commercial loss, disruption to its business operations and genuine financial damage due to Palou’s withdrawal. Those findings formed the basis for the multi million dollar award, with McLaren also expected to recover interest and a portion of its legal costs.

McLaren chief executive Zak Brown did not hide his satisfaction with the outcome. Brown described the verdict as entirely appropriate, insisting that McLaren had honoured every aspect of the agreement and that the judgement validated the team’s position.

For Brown, the ruling was about more than money, it was about protecting the integrity of contracts in an increasingly complex motorsport landscape.

Palou’s legal team argued that the driver believed there was a clear pathway to Formula One that later disappeared, particularly after McLaren signed Oscar Piastri.

They also suggested that McLaren overstated the losses it claimed to have suffered. Those arguments ultimately failed to sway the court. For McLaren, the timing of the verdict is striking. As Formula One prepares for a major regulatory overhaul in 2026, the team enters the new era having asserted its authority off track.

After previous high profile contract sagas, McLaren has once again shown it is willing to fight, and win, when its interests are challenged.

It is not a trophy that will appear in the cabinet at Woking, but make no mistake, this is a victory McLaren will gladly take.