News

Matric pupils fight year-long results withholding in high court challenge

'GROUP COPYING'

Zelda Venter|Published

SECTION27 has taken legal action on behalf of 50 matric pupils who have had their results withheld for over a year due to allegations of "group copying".

Image: File: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Newspapers

SECTION27 has taken legal action on behalf of 50 matric pupils from Baphutheng Senior Secondary School who have had their results withheld for over a year due to allegations of "group copying".

Despite no evidence of cheating being found and invigilators confirming no irregularities, the Limpopo Department of Education has prevented these pupils from pursuing further education or employment.

Section27, who represents the group, said they were wrongfully accused of “group copying”.

It has launched a judicial review application in the Limpopo Division, Polokwane of the High Court on behalf of the 50 former matric pupils from Baphutheng Senior Secondary School, challenging decisions that found them guilty of “group copying” during their final 2024 National Senior Certificate (NSC) examinations.

The decisions, taken by the Acting Head of Department and upheld by the MEC for Education in Limpopo, relate to Business Studies paper 1 and Economics paper 2.

As a result, the pupils results have been withheld for more than a year, placing their education, employment prospects, and futures on hold.

The allegation against the pupils was based solely on the similarity of their examination answers.

The Limpopo Department of Education (LDoE) has not furnished any evidence of cheating or group copying, Section27 said.

Furthermore, no pupil was found in possession of notes or unauthorised material, and there was no evidence of communication or coordination observed in the examination venues. The invigilators also confirmed that there were no irregularities at any stage of the examinations.

“What the Limpopo Department of Education has characterised as ‘group copying’ is, in truth, the foreseeable outcome of how teaching and learning occur at this school,” Section27 said. It described the school as under-resourced, lacking access to textbooks, a library, and learning support materials.

In response to these constraints, teachers employed creative and practical teaching methods to ensure learners could understand and retain complex content.

These included structured oral learning, group recitation, and subject-based songs to memorise key concepts and essay frameworks, the NGO explained.

Section27 said these methods were used openly and consistently throughout the academic year. Pupils practised together in classrooms and on school grounds, reciting and singing content as part of their preparation.

This approach, confirmed by educators and the former principal, was designed to compensate for material shortages and to support comprehension and recall. It also explains why learners produced similar, According to it, the disciplinary process that followed was fundamentally unfair.

“Pupils were subjected to intimidating and coercive questioning, confronted with shifting accusations, and denied a meaningful opportunity to respond".

Section27 said their explanations were not properly interrogated or tested. “Attempts to submit corroborating evidence, including video recordings demonstrating the teaching and learning methods used at the school, were disregarded".

Section27 said the appeal to the MEC failed to address these defects and merely endorsed the original findings without engaging with the substance of the pupils case.

“The consequences have been devastating for the learners. By withholding their results, authorities have excluded them from further study and employment opportunities".

Meanwhile, university application cycles have passed, job prospects have been lost, and the stigma of being labelled “cheaters” has followed them in their communities. For many, the emotional and psychological impact has been profound, Section27 said.

The court will be asked to order the department to release these results.

[email protected]

 

POST