The true cost of "free" financial advice

THE phone call came late one evening. My fitness trainer's wife needed urgent investment advice. She had visited a financial adviser about accessing her preservation fund.

"I already know which portfolios I want," she explained, frustrated.

"But this adviser wants to charge me R20 000 for a 15-minute consultation. She claims she's doing me a favour by dropping her fee from 3.5% to 1%. It's outrageous!"

I asked about her profession.

"I'm an accountant," she replied.

"Would you work for free?" I asked.

Silence.

This exchange captures a troubling paradox. The same professionals who expect fair compensation for their expertise somehow believe financial advice should come free of charge.

The illusion of the 15-minute consultation

What appears as a brief meeting represents the visible tip of a substantial professional iceberg. Before that adviser sat down with my caller, she had spent years acquiring qualifications, maintaining FSCA registrations, and developing expertise. For this consultation, she conducted research, analysed portfolio options, assessed regulatory implications, and prepared tailored recommendations.

That "15-minute consultation" represents career-long expertise. She maintains expensive research platform subscriptions, carries professional indemnity insurance costing thousands annually, and invests continuously in knowledge updates. Reducing professional services to time-based calculations fundamentally misunderstands their nature.

The real value proposition

After reviewing her portfolio selection, I identified alternative investments offering similar risk profiles with potential additional returns of 3% to 4% per annum. On a R2 million preservation fund, this compounds dramatically.

A R2 million investment growing at 8% annually over 20 years yields approximately R9.3 million. At 11%, it yields approximately R16.1 million. That 3% difference, potentially identified through professional advice costing R20 000, delivers an additional R6.8 million at retirement - a 340-to-1 return on investment.

"Would you pay R20 000 for an additional R6.8 million?" I asked.

Her answer: "It's my hard-earned money. Why should someone else charge me to invest it?"

This cognitive disconnect costs South Africans billions in lost retirement savings annually.

Understanding the seven pillars of sound investment

Successful investing rests on seven fundamental principles, emphasised by investment experts globally and particularly relevant in South Africa's FSCA-regulated environment:

1. Time in the market matters more than timing the market. Professional advisers keep you invested through volatility when emotion screams to sell.

2. Strategic entry and exit points require deep market knowledge developed over years - extraordinarily difficult without professional guidance.

3. Asset allocation determines up to 90% of portfolio performance. The decision to hold 60% versus 80% equities impacts wealth far more than choosing between similar funds.

4. Diversification extends beyond holding multiple funds. It requires understanding correlation between assets, sector exposure, and geographic distribution.

5. Cost management involves more than comparing fees. Paying 1% for advice that improves returns by 3% represents exceptional value.

6. Performance analysis requires context casual investors rarely possess - understanding which metrics predict future success and how valuations affect forward expectations.

7. Risk profiling matches investments to your unique circumstances, timeframe, and capacity for loss through comprehensive professional assessment.

The mathematics of professional advice

An adviser charging R20 000 on a R2 million investment represents a 1% fee. If that advice generates an additional 3% annual return, you gain R60 000 in the first year alone.

Over 20 years, even a 1% improvement exceeds R1.8 million. Conversely, avoiding professional fees often proves most expensive. Incorrect tax treatment can trigger consequences costing hundreds of thousands. Poor asset allocation typically costs 2% to 4% annually.

Panic selling permanently impairs wealth. Consider investors who sold during March 2020's Covid-19 panic when markets fell 30% to 40%. Professional advisers counselled clients to maintain positions. Markets recovered within six months, for some even one month. Those who sold suffered permanent destruction. Those guided by professionals preserved and enhanced wealth. This single intervention justified decades of fees.

The hidden costs of "free" advice

Opportunity cost: A 25-year-old achieving 7% returns instead of 10% reaches age 65 with one-third less wealth - millions forfeited to save thousands in fees.

Tax inefficiency: Self-directed investors typically under-utilise tax-advantaged vehicles, paying unnecessary tax that erodes compound growth.

Behavioural mistakes: Research shows investor returns lag market returns by 2% to 4% annually due to buying high, selling low, and reacting emotionally. Professional advisers prevent these wealth-destroying decisions.

The broader perspective

We readily pay doctors, lawyers, and accountants for expertise. Yet when it comes to growing wealth - the foundation of retirement security - we question whether expertise deserves compensation. Yes, unscrupulous advisers exist, as in every profession. The solution is selecting qualified, ethical advisers.

FSCA registration, professional body membership, and transparent fee structures provide safeguards. Don't be intimidated by your financial adviser's success. If they are successful, you are even more successful, for their success is proportionate to yours. Their prosperity reflects the value delivered to clients over years of dedicated service.

The unavoidable truth

Financial advice is never free. You either pay a professional for expert guidance upfront, or you pay far more through sub-optimal returns, tax inefficiency, behavioural mistakes, and lost opportunities. The question is not whether you will pay. You will pay, one way or another. The question is whether you pay a qualified professional thousands for advice worth millions or pay the market millions for ignoring expertise worth thousands.

That accountant, unwilling to compensate a financial professional despite expecting payment for her own expertise, exemplifies a mindset costing South Africans billions annually. When she reaches retirement and discovers her self-directed strategy delivered half the wealth that professional guidance would have generated, she will understand the true cost of "free" advice. But understanding will come too late.

Time, unlike money, cannot be recovered. Stop treating financial advice as an expense to minimise. Start recognising it as an investment that multiplies wealth. The professionals who dedicate careers to mastering this complex field deserve fair compensation because their expertise delivers value that dwarfs their fees. Your financial future is too important for amateur hour. Pay the professional, get the expertise, build the wealth. Everything else is just expensive pretence that you are saving money.

Sanjith Hannuman is the managing director of Avinash Consultants & Actuaries.

** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media. 

THE POST